Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed is facing the greatest test of his leadership

Ethnic and religious tensions that have spilled into violence and the deaths of dozens of protesters have their roots in the 1990s constitution

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. Tiksa Negeri / Reuters

Last month Jawar Mohammed, a prominent African activist and media mogul, accused his country’s prime minister of trying to have him assassinated and criticised the rising “authoritarianism” of the political class.

It is a fairly common story on a continent where too many leaders cling onto power, quashing dissent and mismanaging their resources.

But the target of Mr Jawar’s attack will surprise many. It is Abiy Ahmed, the reformist Ethiopian prime minister who less than a month ago won the Nobel Peace Prize for transforming the east African country and ending a 20-year conflict with its northern neighbour, Eritrea.

The speed of change in Africa’s second most populous country has been unprecedented – and largely positive. But just over a year since Mr Abiy took office, intercommunal violence and ethnonationalism remain a problem, leaving many dead and millions displaced. Mr Abiy’s security forces are accused of using forceful tactics to suppress protests fuelled by ethnic and religious divides. The outbreaks of violence speak to the core challenge of governing Ethiopia, with its complex patchwork of ethnic groups, and the urgency of a new political settlement in Africa’s original empire.Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed won the Nobel Peace Prize last month. Stian Lysberg Solum / EPA

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed won the Nobel Peace Prize last month. Stian Lysberg Solum / EPA

To be clear, the continent’s youngest, most dynamic leader deserves much of the praise that has come his way. A former intelligence chief from Ethiopia’s largest but victimised Oromo ethnic group, often pictured sporting fatigues and doing press-ups with his soldiers, Mr Abiy has been a livewire.

When he came to office, protests that left 500 dead at the hands of security forces in 2016 had rumbled on for two more years. Mr Abiy responded to tensions by releasing thousands of political prisoners, reintegrating illegal armed groups and political parties, and liberating the press and the nation’s fast-growing economy. He set about remodelling authoritarian Ethiopia as a multiparty democracy.

The peace deal with Eritrea, which ended two decades of fighting over a sliver of borderland and required handing over small towns, showed real courage, not least because it angered Ethiopian military hawks. The significance of such a deal, which has implications for stability, growth and trade in east Africa, is clear in both Mr Abiy’s Nobel prize and the role that Gulf states, including the UAE, played in facilitating it.

The conflict was not merely a local problem but a regional one – and Mr Abiy seemed to many the answer.

However, by unmuzzling the press, civil society and myriad groups, Mr Abiy has created a space for the airing of grievances about resources, territory and power, which came to a head with a failed but deadly coup attempt in the northern state of Amhara in mid-June.

It is vital that the prime minister does not lose sight of the progress his administration has already made

Meanwhile, there are fears that Mr Abiy himself is deploying authoritarian tactics, despite the honour bestowed upon him last month by the Nobel committee. In October, the residence of Mr Jawar, founder of the Oromo Media Network, was suddenly surrounded by police in what he denounced as an assassination attempt. After Mr Jawar took to Facebook, his supporters clashed with security forces in Addis Ababa. During the violent exchanges, which evolved into ethnic clashes, at least 86 were killed in the capital – 10 of them by security forces, according to the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission. Earlier, the prime minister had told parliament that he would “take measures” against media owners who undermined the peace of Ethiopia.

In the eastern province of Dadar, protesters burned copies of a new book penned by Mr Abiy and distributed nationally, which sums up his vision for Ethiopia, while chants of “down, down Abiy” could be heard in the capital.

This is the greatest challenge Mr Abiy has faced since taking up office. The world is watching and hoping Ethiopia can move towards stability, to the extent that Pope Francis included the nation’s troubles in his Sunday address at the Vatican. “I ask you to pray for all the victims of violence in that land,” said the pontiff.

To understand how the country reached this point, we must step back to 1991, when the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) overthrew the brutal Marxist-Leninist Derg dictatorship and seized power. A coalition of four parties, the EPRDF has ruled ever since and holds all 547 seats in Ethiopia’s parliament.

In 1995, the party introduced a new national constitution, which divided the country into nine ethnic regions. Rather than choosing to integrate Ethiopia’s myriad ethnic groups – each with their own identities, languages, customs and cultures – the EPRDF opted for segregation, creating a zero-sum game for resources and paving the way for the crisis we see today.

Ethiopian men carrying traditional hand-woven food baskets as they walk to a reconciliation meeting in the Irob district in northern Ethiopia near the border with Eritrea, in the Tigray region, the area most affected by the 1998-2000 border war and the long, bitter stalemate that followed. Michael Tewelde / AFP
Ethiopian men carrying traditional hand-woven food baskets as they walk to a reconciliation meeting in the Irob district in northern Ethiopia near the border with Eritrea, in the Tigray region, the area most affected by the 1998-2000 border war and the long, bitter stalemate that followed. Michael Tewelde / AFP

The Oromo, who make up a third of the population but were traditionally marginalised, joined the Amhara in the streets from 2016 onwards, braving police brutality to demand an end to the supremacy of the Tigrayans, a tiny group that dominated the EPRDF – and therefore the country at large.

Former prime minister Hailemariam Desalegn stepped down in 2018, unable to quell the protests, before Mr Abiy, Ethiopia’s first Oromo leader, was appointed by the EPRDF.

Today, fighting plagues swathes of the country, particularly in the south, where scores of different ethnic groups are in fierce competition for land and resources. Hundreds have died since last year while more people were displaced in Ethiopia in 2018 than in war-torn Syria. Squalid and under-resourced refugee camps are near breaking point.

In the north, the Amhara and Tigrayans are engaged in a territorial dispute, while the latter resent Mr Abiy for pushing them from power.

Protests have been met at times with police violence. Meanwhile, intermittent internet shutdowns have spurred fears of a clampdown on communication.

At an international level, the prime minister is locked in a war of words with Egypt over a $5 billion (Dh18.4bn) Nile dam project – Africa’s largest hydropower facility due to be built near the Ethiopian-Sudanese border – which has Cairo worried about its already scarce access to water. The foreign ministers of Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan will be meeting in Washington tomorrow at the behest of US President Donald Trump to break the deadlock in negotiations.

US President Donald Trump with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El Sisi in the Oval Office in April. Mr Trump has offered to intervene to break the deadlock with Ethiopia over its construction of a massive upstream Nile dam. Evan Vucci / AP

It is vital that the prime minister does not lose sight of the progress his administration has already made. He must ensure that liberty and free speech do not breed paranoia, months before elections in May next year that he has promised will be free, fair and competitive. And he must root out rogue elements within his security forces responsible for the recent bloodshed.

Ethiopia stands at a crossroads. The 1995 constitution that divides people by ethnicity is out of date and needs a reboot. The country must engage in a national dialogue to reassure all groups that their voices will be heard in Mr Abiy’s Ethiopia. The prime minister has worked hard to improve his country and make peace with its neighbour Eritrea. He deserves praise and support but must be cautious in protecting what he has achieved.

If not, the progress Mr Abiy has made could come apart at the seams. And his new Ethiopia could collapse even more quickly than it was built.

Updated: November 6, 2019


  1. Great test for Abiy is Egypt .The rest we took care of it , Nephtegna is not going to make a comeback. We make sure we screen out the Menilik style nephtegna is over and done with .

    Abiy or whoever is not deciding for us, we struggled brought this to make sure no nephtegna system takes a foot hold.

    Egypt diplomacy about the dam may or should prove his greatness on, the other inner stuff about nephtegna menilik sefari we make sure the rule of a gun nephtegna will not return.

  2. The current institutionalized Ethiopian political reforms and the institutionalized Ethiopian economic reforms are beloved to be helping to sprint the development of Ethiopia, since Ethiopia is ready to put the youth to work by attracting international investors .

  3. A country with our history should be able to overcome these obstacles. The challenges of the ethnic tension that is being fueled by those that are shortsighted, as in today’s world… unity is best not division. Together we can create a country that is peaceful for all – because with peace comes work and wealth – and that is what will make us all happier. Not killing and fighting!

  4. It is like giving him an award to name just the recent event mentioned above while not mentioning the other reasons why PM Abiy should resign. He probably feels good about his administration now after reading your letter since the list of reasons why he should resign is endless but only one reason is written above, as if he hasn’t been failing and failing making Ethiopia a failed state for so long.

    International media such as the Washinton Post , New York Times , Reuteurs , BBC , Al Jazeera , VOA and DW would very much be interested in the story on the ground about the Sidama Referendum and other human rights issues in the country so they can write it in a journalistically proven way . I suggest for WOLAITA COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ( WCHR ) to contact the medias I mentioned above and tell them what is really taking place on the ground , since the local medias are not permitted or are not willing to fully investigate and write a full coverage .

    Just not too long ago the Washington Post report came out titled ” After years of repression, Ethiopia’s media is free ” .

    Amnesty international and the Human Rights Watch need to be contacted also with every detail taking place in regards to this referendum of Hawassa and other human rights issues in the country before it is too late , documenting the validity of the WCHR version of what is happening need to be done by as many entities as possible quickly.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here